Papers On Philosophy
Page 70 of 129
|
|
Hume's Theory on Knowledge in the World
[ send me this paper ]
5 pages in length. It
was the conviction of philosopher David Hume that there cannot be
any genine knowledge of the world other than what we are
perceiving at that very moment. Additionally, Hume rejects the
two principles by which mankind can infer anything about future
experience based on our past experience; namely, induction and
the principle of causality. Bibliography lists 1 source.
Filename: JGAhumcn1.wps
Hume, Berkeley and Descartes: Struggling with Reality
[ send me this paper ]
A 5-page paper discussing specific questions about the relationship between the views of David Hume to Rene Descartes and George Berkeley. Specifically discussed are reality and knowledge, cause and effect, miracles and the nature of God. Lists 3 sources.
Filename: khumde.rtf
Ideas of Gould and Bacon Compared
[ send me this paper ]
This 5 page paper delves into science and philosophy as the views of these scientists are compared and contrasted. The religious views of each, as it respects fundamental scientific problems, are discussed. Bibliography lists 1 source.
Filename: SA203sci.rtf
Identity of Meaning Theory
[ send me this paper ]
A 2 page discussion and analysis of the Identity of Meaning Theory as posited by theorists such as U.T. Place. The writer compares identity of meaning with its opposite : factual existence and concludes that indeed, we don't have to actually know how to describe something before we can describe it. No Bibliography.
Filename: Idenmean.wps
Immanuel Kant and the Concept of Ethics
[ send me this paper ]
This 5 page report
discusses Immanuel Kant (1724-1804)who is often described as one
of the greatest of all philosophers. He differentiates rather
carefully between what he thinks of as duties of virtue (ethics)
from duties of justice (right). Bibliography lists 6sources.
Filename: BWkaneth.wps
Immanuel Kant and the Differences Between Acting “in” or “from”
Duty
[ send me this paper ]
This 5 page report discusses Kant’s Grounding for the
Metaphysics of Morals, Kant is determined to find the most
reasonable principle of right or appropriate conduct understood
to be what human beings most commonly think of as moral conduct.
Bibliography lists 2 sources.
Filename: BWacting.wps
Immanuel Kant's "Critique of Pure Reason": Distinctions Between Analytical and Synthetic Judgments and Between A-Priori and A-Posteriori Judgments
[ send me this paper ]
A 5 page overview of Kantian philosophy. Examines the analytical and synthetic approaches to judgments and defines each. Further distinguishes between the a-priori and the a-posteriori approaches. Provides guidance as to why Kant equated the possibility of metaphysics with the possibility of synthetic a-priori judgments. Bibliography lists 3 sources.
Filename: PPkantAr.wps
Immanuel Kant, Autonomy, and a Respect for Liberty
[ send me this paper ]
This 5 page report discusses the philosophy of Immanuel Kant (1724-1804) and how it relates to public policy. According to Kant, for an action to have true moral worth, it must be done from and not merely in accord with duty. Public policy requires a certain action and does not necessarily require any sense of individual autonomy and liberty. Bibliography lists 4 sources.
Filename: BWkanato.rtf
Immanuel Kant’s Vision of Morality and “Political Moralists”
[ send me this paper ]
This 5 page report discusses the philosopher Immanuel Kant
(1724-1804) and his understanding of what constitutes morality
and how it cannot be applied to a concept that would be called
“political moralist.” In Kant’s opinion, the moral point of view
is impartial and favors no particular individual. Morality
requires an individual, according to Kant, that he or she act on
a maxim that they can universalize, in other words that his or
her reasons for a certain action could be considered valid for
anyone in a comparable situation. Bibliography lists 5 sources.
Filename: BWppkant.wps
Immanuel Kant’s “Religion Within the Limits of Reason Alone”
[ send me this paper ]
This 5 page report discusses the thinking of Immanuel Kant
(1724-1804) who is often described as one of the greatest of all
philosophers in relationship to what he wrote and thought about
religion and the “religion of morality.” In Kant’s opinion, the
moral point of view is impartial and favors no particular
individual. Morality requires an individual, according to Kant,
that he or she act on a maxim that they can universalize, in
other words that his or her reasons for a certain action could be
considered valid for anyone in a comparable situation.
Bibliography lists 5 sources.
Filename: BWkanrel.wps
The Paper Store Enterprises, Inc. Gladly Accepts:
Request A Free
Excerpt From Any Paper Before Ordering!
|